The Magic of Self-Attention
🧩 1. Starting Point — What’s the Problem?
Old models like RNNs or LSTMs read sentences one word at a time, remembering the past in a “hidden state.”
That’s slow and limited — they forget long-range context.
Transformers fixed that.
They read all words at once, then decide which words should pay attention to which others.
That magic is called Self-Attention.
⚙️ 2. The Core Idea — Self-Attention
When the model reads a sentence like:
“The animal didn’t cross the street because it was too tired.”
It must figure out what “it” refers to.
Self-attention helps the model “look around” the sentence and realize “it” means “the animal,” not “the street.”
So when processing each word, the model considers all other words and assigns each one a score of how relevant it is.
🧠 3. The Ingredients — Q, K, V (Query, Key, Value)
Every word (after turning into an embedding, a vector of numbers representing its meaning) is used to make three smaller vectors:
| Role | Formula | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| Query (Q) | Q = X × WQ | What this word is looking for |
| Key (K) | K = X × WK | What this word offers |
| Value (V) | V = X × WV | The actual info it carries |
Think of:
- Query = a question a word asks (“Who am I connected to?”)
- Key = a tag saying “I represent a cat / a subject / a verb”
- Value = the meaning you pass if someone pays attention to you.
🔢 4. The Math of “Paying Attention”
Each word compares its Query (Q) with all the other Keys (K):
[ \text{score} = Q \cdot K^T ]
→ The higher the dot product, the more similar the word meanings — the more attention one pays to the other.
Then we:
- Scale down the scores by dividing by √(key dimension), e.g., √64 = 8.
(stabilizes the math) - Softmax them → turn scores into probabilities that sum to 1.
(how much of your attention to give each word) - Multiply each Value (V) by these attention weights.
(focus more on relevant words) - Sum all of them to get the output vector — a new meaning for the word that now includes info from others.
🧮 5. Doing It for a Whole Sentence (Matrix Version)
If you have 5 words:
- Pack all word embeddings into a matrix X.
- Multiply by WQ, WK, WV to get matrices Q, K, and V.
Then compute:
[ \text{Attention}(Q, K, V) = \text{softmax}\left(\frac{QK^T}{\sqrt{d_k}}\right)V ]
This one line is the core equation of self-attention — used in every Transformer, from GPT-2 to GPT-5.
👑 6. Multi-Headed Attention
One attention mechanism might focus only on one kind of relation (like subject-verb).
But we need multiple “angles of understanding.”
So the model runs 8 or more attention heads — each has its own WQ, WK, WV — to learn different types of relationships:
- one head might track who does what,
- another focuses on adjectives,
- another on long-distance dependencies.
Then they’re all combined:
[ \text{MultiHead}(Q,K,V) = \text{Concat}(\text{head}_1,…,\text{head}_h)W^O ]
That’s how the model can “think” from multiple perspectives at once.
🧩 7. Positional Encoding — Order Matters
Transformers read all tokens simultaneously — no natural order like RNNs.
So we add Positional Encodings to tell the model where each word sits.
These are sinusoidal (sine/cosine) wave patterns that encode position as continuous signals: [ PE_{(pos, 2i)} = \sin(pos / 10000^{2i/d_{model}}) ] [ PE_{(pos, 2i+1)} = \cos(pos / 10000^{2i/d_{model}}) ] This gives each position a unique pattern and preserves relative distance.
🧱 8. Encoder and Decoder Blocks
- Encoder:
- Self-Attention → Feed-Forward → Output
- Each layer learns deeper relationships.
- Decoder:
- Has Self-Attention too, but masked (so it can’t peek at future words).
- Also attends to encoder output (so it can focus on the relevant parts of the input sentence).
🧮 9. Final Linear + Softmax
After decoding, the model outputs a vector of size equal to its vocabulary (say, 50,000 words).
Softmax turns those raw numbers into probabilities.
The word with the highest probability is chosen.
That’s how text is generated, one token at a time.
🧠 10. Training and Loss Function
During training:
- The model predicts the next word.
- We compare its prediction to the correct answer using cross-entropy loss.
- Then adjust weights via backpropagation to reduce the error.
Over millions of examples, it learns language structure and meaning.
🏗️ 11. Key Intuitions
| Concept | What It Does | Analogy |
|---|---|---|
| Embedding | Turns words into numbers with meaning | Colors in a palette |
| Self-Attention | Decides who to listen to | Conversation in a group |
| Multi-Head | Sees from multiple perspectives | Different experts in a meeting |
| Positional Encoding | Keeps track of order | Page numbers in a book |
| Feed-Forward | Refines info per token | Each person thinks individually |
| Residuals | Keep the original idea while refining | Helps deep networks learn |
| Softmax | Turns scores into probabilities | Voting |
| Loss | Penalizes wrong predictions | Teacher grading a test |
| Backprop | Adjusts weights to improve | Correcting your aim after each throw |
🧩 12. How This Scales to LLMs
| Mini Transformer | Modern LLM |
|---|---|
| 2–6 layers | 70–100+ layers |
| 512-dim embeddings | 4096–16384 dims |
| 8 heads | 32–128 heads |
| Single GPU | Thousands of GPUs |
| Megabytes of text | Trillions of tokens |
But the math and ideas are identical.
🧩 13. Visual Summary
To visualize:
- Each word is like a node that shines light toward other nodes.
- Attention weights decide how bright each connection is.
- Multi-headed attention is like shining light in different colors — each highlights different relationships.